Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id KAA16773 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 10:33:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA187033391; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 07:29:52 -0700
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 07:29:51 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <1239@scribendum.win-uk.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Stephen Benson <stephenb@scribendum.win-uk.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: SOMEONE SAID THIS!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>In article <317A52CF.5E97@mcs.net> Dan Ablan <dma@mcs.net> writes:
>..
>> > If it doesn't cost too much to make a render plugin for Max or 3DS
.
.
.
> However, even if it does make economic or marketing sense, I suspect
>that such a thing will never happen.
>
> Many people have approached Questar asking why we don't make WCS a plug-in
>for graphics-package-n as well (where n=[Lightwave, 3DS, MAX, etc]). While
>I'm sure people would buy it, the fact remains that a stand-alone program like
>LW or WCS is architected very differently than a plug-in, and would entail
>virtually a complete rewrite to adapt.
Worth noting that Yonowat Amapi did this... it's a modeller not a